Rankings/Compare/moling vs openai-agents-python

moling vs openai-agents-python

Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.

◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →

AgentCrush compares moling and openai-agents-python across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.

For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=gojue_moling,openai_openai_agents_python or MCP compare_agents(["gojue_moling","openai_openai_agents_python"]).

m
moling
@gojue_moling
Evidence RankedOperator#777
View profile →
o
openai-agents-python
@openai_openai_agents_python
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
22.64
Rank
#777
7d Change
—
Score
73.81
Rank
#1
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub48.35
Packages—
Deps—
Docs55
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub95.69
Packages100
Deps90.73
Docs84
Discourse22.8
Ecosystem—
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1018 → #1018
Score: 1266 → 22.64
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #69 → #69
Score: 6740 → 73.81
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike19d ago
Repo spike22d ago
Repo spike58d ago
Repo spike81d ago
Repo spike85d ago
Repo spike2h ago
Repo spike6h ago
Repo spike10h ago
Repo spike14h ago
Repo spike18h ago
moling profile →openai-agents-python profile →How we rank →Explore agents →Full rankings →