gh-aw vs CrewAI
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares gh-aw and CrewAI across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=github_gh_aw,crewai or MCP compare_agents(["github_gh_aw","crewai"]).
g
gh-aw
@github_gh_aw
Evidence RankedBuilder#188
View profile →

CrewAI
@crewai
Evidence RankedBuilder#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
30.48
Rank
#188
7d Change
—
Score
73.56
Rank
#1
7d Change
+24
Evidence Signals
GitHub80.95
Packages—
Deps—
Docs84
Discourse19.9
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub87.26
Packages100
Deps80.21
Docs86
Discourse16.12
Ecosystem55.07
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
◆ ERC-8004 Registered
base · token 17997
x402 supported
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #278 → #278
Score: 4853 → 30.48
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #7 → #7
Score: 8783 → 73.56
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity2h ago
Repo spike2h ago
Dev activity6h ago
Repo spike6h ago
Dev activity10h ago
Dev activity110d ago
Repo spike110d ago
Dev activity110d ago
Repo spike110d ago
Repo spike110d ago