ReCode vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares ReCode and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=foundationagents_recode,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["foundationagents_recode","openclaw"]).
R
ReCode
@foundationagents_recode
Evidence RankedBuilder#867
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
21.68
Rank
#867
7d Change
—
Score
70.93
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub47.28
Packages—
Deps—
Docs44
Discourse21.52
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps88
Docs84
Discourse30.66
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #955 → #955
Score: 1379 → 21.68
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9238 → 70.93
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike2d ago
Repo spike3d ago
Repo spike18d ago
Repo spike24d ago
Repo spike29d ago
Dev activity163d ago
Repo spike163d ago
Dev activity163d ago
Repo spike163d ago
Dev activity163d ago