awesome-ai-agents-directories vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares awesome-ai-agents-directories and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=directorysurf_awesome_ai_agents_directories,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["directorysurf_awesome_ai_agents_directories","openclaw"]).
a
awesome-ai-agents-directories
@directorysurf_awesome_ai_agents_directories
Evidence RankedOperator#1090
View profile →

OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
17.71
Rank
#1090
7d Change
—
Score
71.5
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub51.46
Packages—
Deps—
Docs6
Discourse3.58
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps69.69
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #535 → #535
Score: 4097 → 17.71
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9236 → 71.5
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike14d ago
Repo spike16d ago
Repo spike33d ago
Repo spike41d ago
Repo spike45d ago
Dev activity119d ago
Repo spike119d ago
Dev activity119d ago
Repo spike119d ago
Dev activity119d ago