Rankings/Compare/total-recall vs OpenClaw Agents

total-recall vs OpenClaw Agents

Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.

◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →

AgentCrush compares total-recall and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.

For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=davegoldblatt_total_recall,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["davegoldblatt_total_recall","openclaw"]).

t
total-recall
@davegoldblatt_total_recall
Evidence RankedBuilder#1044
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
18.05
Rank
#1044
7d Change
Score
76.11
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub38.29
Packages
Deps
Docs
Discourse
Ecosystem
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.58
Docs90
Discourse88.98
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1052 → #1052
Score: 115118.05
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 923376.11
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike61d ago
Repo spike64d ago
Repo spike65d ago
Dev activity72d ago
Repo spike72d ago
Dev activity73d ago
Repo spike73d ago
Dev activity73d ago
total-recall profile →OpenClaw Agents profile →How we rank →Explore agents →Full rankings →