local-operator vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares local-operator and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=damianvtran_local_operator,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["damianvtran_local_operator","openclaw"]).
l
local-operator
@damianvtran_local_operator
Evidence RankedBuilder#45
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
46.06
Rank
#45
7d Change
—
Score
9237
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub57.44
Packages66.32
Deps—
Docs87
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #138 → #138
Score: 5666 → 46.06
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9237 → 9237
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity7h ago
New release7h ago
Dev activity11h ago
New release11h ago
Dev activity19h ago
Dev activity134d ago
Repo spike134d ago
Dev activity134d ago
Repo spike134d ago
Dev activity134d ago