linearis vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares linearis and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=czottmann_linearis,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["czottmann_linearis","openclaw"]).
l
linearis
@czottmann_linearis
Evidence RankedOperator#696
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
21.05
Rank
#696
7d Change
—
Score
78.68
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub56.31
Packages—
Deps—
Docs—
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub100
Packages100
Deps69.2
Docs90
Discourse98.68
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1011 → #1011
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #28 → #28
Score: 7900 → 78.68
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike7h ago
Repo spike5d ago
Repo spike6d ago
Dev activity9d ago
Repo spike11d ago
Dev activity27d ago
Repo spike27d ago
Repo spike27d ago
Dev activity27d ago
Repo spike28d ago