linearis vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares linearis and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=czottmann_linearis,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["czottmann_linearis","openclaw"]).
l
linearis
@czottmann_linearis
Evidence RankedOperator#455
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
26.26
Rank
#455
7d Change
—
Score
9236
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub58.05
Packages—
Deps—
Docs79
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #510 → #510
Score: 4201 → 26.26
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9236 → 9236
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity2h ago
Dev activity2d ago
Dev activity2d ago
Dev activity2d ago
Dev activity3d ago
Dev activity124d ago
Repo spike124d ago
Dev activity124d ago
Repo spike124d ago
Dev activity124d ago