ClawMobile vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares ClawMobile and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=clawmobile_clawmobile,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["clawmobile_clawmobile","openclaw"]).
C
ClawMobile
@clawmobile_clawmobile
Evidence RankedOperator#813
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
20.65
Rank
#813
7d Change
—
Score
76.51
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub53.89
Packages—
Deps—
Docs—
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.48
Docs90
Discourse92.7
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #594 → #594
Score: 4057 → 20.65
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9233 → 76.51
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike3d ago
Dev activity3d ago
New release3d ago
Repo spike4d ago
Repo spike4d ago
Dev activity61d ago
Repo spike61d ago
Dev activity61d ago
Repo spike61d ago
Dev activity62d ago