ClawMobile vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares ClawMobile and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=clawmobile_clawmobile,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["clawmobile_clawmobile","openclaw"]).
C
ClawMobile
@clawmobile_clawmobile
Evidence RankedOperator#882
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
20.67
Rank
#882
7d Change
—
Score
9236
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub54.02
Packages—
Deps—
Docs—
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #542 → #542
Score: 4062 → 20.67
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9236 → 9236
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike20d ago
Repo spike31d ago
Repo spike33d ago
Repo spike48d ago
Dev activity48d ago
Dev activity120d ago
Repo spike120d ago
Dev activity120d ago
Repo spike120d ago
Dev activity120d ago