core vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares core and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=cheshire_cat_ai_core,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["cheshire_cat_ai_core","openclaw"]).
c
core
@cheshire_cat_ai_core
Evidence RankedOperator#237
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#28
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
26.5
Rank
#237
7d Change
—
Score
7900
Rank
#28
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub65.49
Packages—
Deps—
Docs67
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #444 → #444
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #28 → #28
Score: 7900 → 7900
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike2d ago
Repo spike4d ago
Repo spike6d ago
Repo spike8d ago
Repo spike12d ago
Dev activity27d ago
Repo spike27d ago
Dev activity27d ago
Repo spike27d ago
Dev activity28d ago