council vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares council and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=chain_ml_council,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["chain_ml_council","openclaw"]).
c
council
@chain_ml_council
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#918
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
1467
Rank
#918
7d Change
—
Score
71.5
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps69.69
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #918 → #918
Score: 1467 → 1467
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9236 → 71.5
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike8d ago
Repo spike35d ago
Repo spike45d ago
Repo spike50d ago
Repo spike55d ago
Dev activity118d ago
Repo spike118d ago
Dev activity118d ago
Repo spike118d ago
Dev activity118d ago