edict vs openai-agents-python
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares edict and openai-agents-python across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=cft0808_edict,openai_openai_agents_python or MCP compare_agents(["cft0808_edict","openai_openai_agents_python"]).
e
edict
@cft0808_edict
Evidence RankedOperator#1038
View profile →
o
openai-agents-python
@openai_openai_agents_python
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
19.12
Rank
#1038
7d Change
—
Score
73.84
Rank
#1
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub—
Packages—
Deps—
Docs73
Discourse16.41
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub95.77
Packages100
Deps90.8
Docs84
Discourse22.8
Ecosystem—
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #620 → #620
Score: 3316 → 19.12
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #73 → #73
Score: 6742 → 73.84
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
No recent signals
Dev activity3h ago
Repo spike3h ago
Dev activity7h ago
Repo spike7h ago
Dev activity19h ago