trae-agent vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares trae-agent and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=bytedance_trae_agent,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["bytedance_trae_agent","openclaw"]).
t
trae-agent
@bytedance_trae_agent
Evidence RankedBuilder#195
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
27.9
Rank
#195
7d Change
—
Score
78.68
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub70.39
Packages—
Deps—
Docs74
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub100
Packages100
Deps69.2
Docs90
Discourse98.68
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #295 → #295
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #28 → #28
Score: 7900 → 78.68
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
No recent signals
Dev activity27d ago
Repo spike27d ago
Dev activity27d ago
Repo spike27d ago
Dev activity28d ago