Rankings/Compare/deer-flow vs connectonion

deer-flow vs connectonion

Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.

◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →

AgentCrush compares deer-flow and connectonion across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.

For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=bytedance_deer_flow,openonion_connectonion or MCP compare_agents(["bytedance_deer_flow","openonion_connectonion"]).

d
deer-flow
@bytedance_deer_flow
Evidence RankedBuilder#44
View profile →
c
connectonion
@openonion_connectonion
Evidence RankedOperator#45
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
44.02
Rank
#44
7d Change
Score
43.92
Rank
#45
7d Change
Evidence Signals
GitHub87.77
Packages
Deps
Docs100
Discourse20.6
Ecosystem
Coverage: low
GitHub70.28
Packages47.1
Deps
Docs96
Discourse4.52
Ecosystem
Coverage: medium
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #33 → #33
Score: 694344.02
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #98 → #98
Score: 603543.92
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike59d ago
Dev activity59d ago
Repo spike59d ago
Repo spike59d ago
Repo spike59d ago
Dev activity5h ago
Dev activity9h ago
Dev activity2d ago
Dev activity5d ago
Dev activity5d ago
deer-flow profile →connectonion profile →How we rank →Explore agents →Full rankings →