deer-flow vs cascadeflow
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares deer-flow and cascadeflow across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=bytedance_deer_flow,lemony_ai_cascadeflow or MCP compare_agents(["bytedance_deer_flow","lemony_ai_cascadeflow"]).
d
deer-flow
@bytedance_deer_flow
Evidence RankedBuilder#43
View profile →
c
cascadeflow
@lemony_ai_cascadeflow
Evidence RankedOperator#44
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
44.02
Rank
#43
7d Change
—
Score
43.99
Rank
#44
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub87.77
Packages—
Deps—
Docs100
Discourse20.6
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub78.72
Packages35.68
Deps—
Docs96
Discourse11.08
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #33 → #33
Score: 6941 → 44.02
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #90 → #90
Score: 6249 → 43.99
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike52d ago
Dev activity52d ago
Repo spike52d ago
Repo spike52d ago
Repo spike53d ago
Repo spike14h ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike1d ago