browser-use vs mini-swe-agent
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares browser-use and mini-swe-agent across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. Both are indexed but not yet evidence-ranked. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=browser_use_browser_use,swe_agent_mini_swe_agent or MCP compare_agents(["browser_use_browser_use","swe_agent_mini_swe_agent"]).
b
browser-use
@browser_use_browser_use
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#22
View profile →
m
mini-swe-agent
@swe_agent_mini_swe_agent
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#103
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
7040
Rank
#22
7d Change
—
Score
6480
Rank
#103
7d Change
—
Evidence SignalsEvidence ranking not yet assigned
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Trust Context
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #22 → #22
Score: 7040 → 7040
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #103 → #103
Score: 6480 → 6480
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike176d ago
Repo spike176d ago
Repo spike176d ago
Repo spike177d ago
Dev activity177d ago
Repo spike2h ago
Repo spike6h ago
Repo spike10h ago
Repo spike18h ago
Repo spike22h ago