squad vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares squad and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=bradygaster_squad,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["bradygaster_squad","openclaw"]).
s
squad
@bradygaster_squad
Evidence RankedOperator#169
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
31.28
Rank
#169
7d Change
—
Score
9236
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub78.14
Packages—
Deps—
Docs94
Discourse25.15
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #327 → #327
Score: 4750 → 31.28
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9236 → 9236
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity3h ago
Dev activity1d ago
Dev activity1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Dev activity2d ago
Dev activity118d ago
Repo spike118d ago
Dev activity118d ago
Repo spike118d ago
Dev activity118d ago