takopi vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares takopi and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=banteg_takopi,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["banteg_takopi","openclaw"]).
t
takopi
@banteg_takopi
Evidence RankedBuilder#133
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
34.64
Rank
#133
7d Change
—
Score
71.5
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub57.16
Packages37.95
Deps—
Docs58
Discourse3.58
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps69.69
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #619 → #619
Score: 3011 → 34.64
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9236 → 71.5
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike9h ago
Repo spike15d ago
Repo spike18d ago
Repo spike22d ago
Repo spike24d ago
Dev activity121d ago
Repo spike121d ago
Dev activity121d ago
Repo spike121d ago
Dev activity121d ago