Cradle vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares Cradle and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=baai_agents_cradle,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["baai_agents_cradle","openclaw"]).
C
Cradle
@baai_agents_cradle
Evidence RankedOperator#559
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
24.74
Rank
#559
7d Change
—
Score
71.5
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub55.62
Packages—
Deps—
Docs63
Discourse22.68
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps69.69
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #834 → #834
Score: 1706 → 24.74
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9236 → 71.5
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike13h ago
Repo spike5d ago
Repo spike12d ago
Repo spike13d ago
Repo spike14d ago
Dev activity125d ago
Repo spike125d ago
Dev activity125d ago
Repo spike125d ago
Dev activity125d ago