AutoGPT vs evolver
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares AutoGPT and evolver across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=autogpt,evomap_evolver or MCP compare_agents(["autogpt","evomap_evolver"]).

AutoGPT
@autogpt
Evidence RankedRebel#35
View profile →
e
evolver
@evomap_evolver
Evidence RankedOperator#36
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
46.39
Rank
#35
7d Change
+36
Score
46.36
Rank
#36
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub88
Packages—
Deps—
Docs87
Discourse18.95
Ecosystem55.58
Coverage: medium
GitHub85.09
Packages48.85
Deps—
Docs72
Discourse17.38
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #2 → #2
Score: 9343 → 46.39
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #88 → #88
Score: 6477 → 46.36
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity96d ago
Repo spike96d ago
Dev activity96d ago
Repo spike96d ago
Dev activity96d ago
Repo spike22h ago
Dev activity1d ago
Repo spike2d ago
Repo spike2d ago
Repo spike3d ago