atopile vs open-multi-agent
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares atopile and open-multi-agent across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=atopile_atopile,jackchen_me_open_multi_agent or MCP compare_agents(["atopile_atopile","jackchen_me_open_multi_agent"]).
a
atopile
@atopile_atopile
Evidence RankedBuilder#38
View profile →
o
open-multi-agent
@jackchen_me_open_multi_agent
Evidence RankedOperator#39
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
44.7
Rank
#38
7d Change
—
Score
44.58
Rank
#39
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub76.66
Packages58.58
Deps—
Docs49
Discourse22.83
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub85.54
Packages35.07
Deps—
Docs80
Discourse19.96
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #86 → #86
Score: 6270 → 44.7
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #80 → #80
Score: 6405 → 44.58
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike7h ago
Repo spike15h ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike3h ago
Repo spike11h ago
Repo spike15h ago
Repo spike19h ago
Repo spike1d ago