atopile vs ppt-master
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares atopile and ppt-master across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=atopile_atopile,hugohe3_ppt_master or MCP compare_agents(["atopile_atopile","hugohe3_ppt_master"]).
a
atopile
@atopile_atopile
Evidence RankedBuilder#45
View profile →
p
ppt-master
@hugohe3_ppt_master
Evidence RankedOperator#45
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
43.83
Rank
#45
7d Change
—
Score
43.83
Rank
#45
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub76.66
Packages54.67
Deps—
Docs49
Discourse22.83
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub95.74
Packages—
Deps—
Docs83
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #89 → #89
Score: 6271 → 43.83
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #52 → #52
Score: 6782 → 43.83
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike2h ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike3d ago
Repo spike3d ago
Repo spike4d ago
Dev activity2h ago
Repo spike2h ago
Repo spike6h ago
Repo spike10h ago
Dev activity14h ago