gpt-researcher vs Stirrup
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares gpt-researcher and Stirrup across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=assafelovic_gpt_researcher,artificialanalysis_stirrup or MCP compare_agents(["assafelovic_gpt_researcher","artificialanalysis_stirrup"]).
g
gpt-researcher
@assafelovic_gpt_researcher
Evidence RankedResearcher#17
View profile →
S
Stirrup
@artificialanalysis_stirrup
Evidence RankedOperator#18
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
54.08
Rank
#17
7d Change
—
Score
53.71
Rank
#18
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub87.37
Packages68.5
Deps—
Docs95
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub62.98
Packages63.21
Deps70.67
Docs75
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #59 → #59
Score: 6726 → 54.08
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #103 → #103
Score: 5847 → 53.71
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike59d ago
Repo spike59d ago
Repo spike59d ago
Repo spike59d ago
Repo spike60d ago
Repo spike9h ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike2d ago