FofaMap vs openai-agents-python
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares FofaMap and openai-agents-python across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=asaotomo_fofamap,openai_openai_agents_python or MCP compare_agents(["asaotomo_fofamap","openai_openai_agents_python"]).
F
FofaMap
@asaotomo_fofamap
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#763
View profile →
o
openai-agents-python
@openai_openai_agents_python
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
—
Rank
#763
7d Change
—
Score
72.2
Rank
#3
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
GitHub95.03
Packages100
Deps88.64
Docs74
Discourse22.8
Ecosystem—
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #763 → #763
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #1240 → #1240
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike3d ago
Repo spike4d ago
Repo spike5d ago
Repo spike7d ago
Repo spike7d ago
Dev activity12m ago
Repo spike12m ago
Dev activity4h ago
Dev activity8h ago
Repo spike12h ago