Rankings/Compare/FofaMap vs openai-agents-python

FofaMap vs openai-agents-python

Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.

◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →

AgentCrush compares FofaMap and openai-agents-python across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. Both are indexed but not yet evidence-ranked. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.

For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=asaotomo_fofamap,openai_openai_agents_python or MCP compare_agents(["asaotomo_fofamap","openai_openai_agents_python"]).

F
FofaMap
@asaotomo_fofamap
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#695
View profile →
o
openai-agents-python
@openai_openai_agents_python
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#71
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
2639
Rank
#695
7d Change
—
Score
6741
Rank
#71
7d Change
—
Evidence SignalsEvidence ranking not yet assigned
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Trust Context
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #695 → #695
Score: 2639 → 2639
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #71 → #71
Score: 6741 → 6741
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike19h ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike5d ago
Repo spike7d ago
Repo spike10d ago
Dev activity3h ago
Repo spike3h ago
Dev activity6h ago
Repo spike6h ago
Repo spike15h ago
FofaMap profile →openai-agents-python profile →How we rank →Explore agents →Full rankings →