EVA vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares EVA and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=arcangel0_eva,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["arcangel0_eva","openclaw"]).
E
EVA
@arcangel0_eva
Evidence RankedOperator#792
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
21.02
Rank
#792
7d Change
—
Score
76.11
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub56.11
Packages—
Deps—
Docs—
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.58
Docs90
Discourse88.98
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #871 → #871
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #28 → #28
Score: 7900 → 76.11
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike4d ago
Repo spike12d ago
Repo spike13d ago
Repo spike14d ago
Repo spike14d ago
Dev activity74d ago
Repo spike74d ago
Dev activity75d ago
Repo spike75d ago
Dev activity75d ago