yume vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares yume and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=aofp_yume,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["aofp_yume","openclaw"]).
y
yume
@aofp_yume
Evidence RankedBuilder#490
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
24.65
Rank
#490
7d Change
—
Score
71.48
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub52.23
Packages—
Deps—
Docs71
Discourse20.28
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps69.6
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #564 → #564
Score: 4087 → 24.65
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9234 → 71.48
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike4d ago
Repo spike8d ago
Dev activity11d ago
New release11d ago
Repo spike16d ago
Dev activity90d ago
Repo spike90d ago
Dev activity90d ago
Repo spike90d ago
Dev activity90d ago