agent-craft vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares agent-craft and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=annyfee_agent_craft,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["annyfee_agent_craft","openclaw"]).
a
agent-craft
@annyfee_agent_craft
Evidence RankedResearcher#569
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
24.36
Rank
#569
7d Change
—
Score
9236
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub58.17
Packages—
Deps—
Docs56
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #475 → #475
Score: 4338 → 24.36
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9236 → 9236
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike3h ago
Repo spike2d ago
Repo spike3d ago
Repo spike6d ago
Repo spike6d ago
Dev activity119d ago
Repo spike119d ago
Dev activity119d ago
Repo spike119d ago
Dev activity119d ago