AgentUp vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares AgentUp and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=always_further_agentup,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["always_further_agentup","openclaw"]).
A
AgentUp
@always_further_agentup
Evidence RankedBuilder#597
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
23.42
Rank
#597
7d Change
—
Score
71.48
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub46.89
Packages—
Deps—
Docs82
Discourse5.24
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps69.6
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #750 → #750
Score: 2252 → 23.42
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9234 → 71.48
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike26d ago
Repo spike31d ago
Repo spike38d ago
Dev activity45d ago
Dev activity46d ago
Dev activity91d ago
Repo spike91d ago
Dev activity91d ago
Repo spike91d ago
Dev activity91d ago