BuildArena vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares BuildArena and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=ai4science_westlakeu_buildarena,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["ai4science_westlakeu_buildarena","openclaw"]).
B
BuildArena
@ai4science_westlakeu_buildarena
Evidence RankedBuilder#756
View profile →

OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
21.36
Rank
#756
7d Change
—
Score
76.11
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub37.14
Packages—
Deps—
Docs62
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.56
Docs90
Discourse88.98
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #779 → #779
Score: 2193 → 21.36
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9233 → 76.11
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike24d ago
Repo spike42d ago
Repo spike49d ago
Repo spike64d ago
Dev activity81d ago
Dev activity71d ago
Repo spike71d ago
Dev activity71d ago
Repo spike71d ago
Dev activity71d ago