agent-teams-ai vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares agent-teams-ai and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=777genius_agent_teams_ai,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["777genius_agent_teams_ai","openclaw"]).
a
agent-teams-ai
@777genius_agent_teams_ai
Evidence RankedBuilder#256
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#2
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
28.47
Rank
#256
7d Change
—
Score
73.03
Rank
#2
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub74.33
Packages—
Deps—
Docs73
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.57
Docs88
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #385 → #385
Score: 4635 → 28.47
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9234 → 73.03
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity3h ago
Repo spike3h ago
Dev activity7h ago
Dev activity11h ago
Repo spike11h ago
Dev activity84d ago
Repo spike84d ago
Dev activity84d ago
Repo spike84d ago
Dev activity84d ago