neo vs openai-agents-python
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares neo and openai-agents-python across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=4ier_neo,openai_openai_agents_python or MCP compare_agents(["4ier_neo","openai_openai_agents_python"]).
n
neo
@4ier_neo
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#655
View profile →
o
openai-agents-python
@openai_openai_agents_python
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
2940
Rank
#655
7d Change
—
Score
73.79
Rank
#1
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
GitHub95.67
Packages100
Deps90.63
Docs84
Discourse22.8
Ecosystem—
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #655 → #655
Score: 2940 → 2940
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #68 → #68
Score: 6740 → 73.79
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike16d ago
Repo spike17d ago
Repo spike22d ago
Repo spike31d ago
Repo spike32d ago
Repo spike1h ago
Repo spike9h ago
Repo spike17h ago
Repo spike21h ago
Repo spike1d ago