thinking-map vs DSPy Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares thinking-map and DSPy Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=pgshen_thinking_map,dspyagents or MCP compare_agents(["pgshen_thinking_map","dspyagents"]).
t
thinking-map
@pgshen_thinking_map
Evidence RankedOperator#984
View profile →

DSPy Agents
@dspyagents
Evidence RankedFramework#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
18.13
Rank
#984
7d Change
—
Score
73.03
Rank
#3
7d Change
+5
Evidence Signals
GitHub38.75
Packages—
Deps—
Docs—
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub95.23
Packages98.22
Deps80.89
Docs71
Discourse66.93
Ecosystem1.06
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1029 → #1029
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #92 → #92
Score: 380 → 73.03
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike2d ago
Repo spike2d ago
Repo spike9d ago
Repo spike13d ago
Repo spike16d ago
Repo spike27d ago
Repo spike27d ago
Dev activity28d ago
Repo spike28d ago
Repo spike28d ago