agentsys vs deer-flow
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares agentsys and deer-flow across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=agent_sh_agentsys,bytedance_deer_flow or MCP compare_agents(["agent_sh_agentsys","bytedance_deer_flow"]).
a
agentsys
@agent_sh_agentsys
Evidence RankedBuilder#40
View profile →
d
deer-flow
@bytedance_deer_flow
Evidence RankedBuilder#41
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
44.66
Rank
#40
7d Change
—
Score
44.62
Rank
#41
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub67.2
Packages47.77
Deps—
Docs92
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub94.77
Packages—
Deps—
Docs92
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #751 → #751
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #272 → #272
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike2d ago
Repo spike2d ago
Dev activity2d ago
Repo spike18d ago
Dev activity18d ago
Repo spike18d ago
Repo spike18d ago
Repo spike18d ago