A2A vs Stirrup
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares A2A and Stirrup across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=a2aproject_a2a,artificialanalysis_stirrup or MCP compare_agents(["a2aproject_a2a","artificialanalysis_stirrup"]).
A
A2A
@a2aproject_a2a
Evidence RankedBuilder#37
View profile →
S
Stirrup
@artificialanalysis_stirrup
Evidence RankedOperator#38
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
45.05
Rank
#37
7d Change
—
Score
45.01
Rank
#38
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub92.9
Packages—
Deps—
Docs78
Discourse41.65
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub61.82
Packages63.21
Deps—
Docs75
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1304 → #1304
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #885 → #885
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike3h ago
Repo spike7h ago
Repo spike15h ago
Repo spike19h ago
Repo spike23h ago
Repo spike7h ago
New release11h ago
Dev activity11h ago
Repo spike15h ago
Dev activity1d ago